Summary
Dracula is easily the most famous vampire in fiction and pop culture, with many adaptations on the big screen, including the remake ofNosferatu. Some filmmakers have turned him into the hero and villain of action movies, others have used him for parody, and then others have delved into the horrors of Count Dracula.
The character of Dracula, as the quintessential vampire, has inspired numerous adaptations of Bram Stoker’s novel over the decades. From the 1920s to the 2020s, different actors have portrayed him in various ways, showcasing him as a calculated villain, a bloodthirsty monster, and a tragic figure. These interpretations vary in their level of fright, with some depictions being scarier than others.
Updated July 15, 2025, by Melody MacReady:Fans of Dracula are fortunate to witness a resurgence in the character’s popularity, particularly with Robert Eggers' upcoming film, Nosferatu, which is the latest among several adaptations of Dracula on the big screen. Nosferatu continues a long tradition of Dracula films, some of which take the character in radically new directions, while others attempt to adapt Bram Stoker’s novel almost word-for-word. Each film utilizes different filmmaking techniques, features a distinctive actor in the role of Dracula and his counterparts, and employs various forms of the horror genre to instill fear in viewers.
Dracula 2000takes nearly all the conventional vampire tropes and either discards or twists them. Rather than a Wallachian noble who traded his soul to be a vampire, Gerard Butler’s Dracula is revealed to be two thousand years old, hence the title, and his real name is Judas, the man who betrayed Jesus Christ for silver.
Most of the horror inDracula 2000comes from Gerard Butler, who is equally charming as he is imposing. His version of Dracula is a relentless one, slaughtering his victims left and right while also creating an army of twisted minions that serve him. It helps that typical weaknesses like a stake through the heart, crucifixes, and holy water do not work.
12Son Of Dracula
Lon Chaney Jr. Knows How To Play A Werewolf And A Vampire
Trading Bela Lugosi for another iconic Universal Monster star,Son Of Draculastars Lon Chaney Jr., who was more famousfor playing the Wolf Man. He plays Count Alucard, the supposed descendant of Dracula. It also ditches the European settings of London and Transylvania for the Southern region of the United States.
While it doesn’t hold a candle to the original,Son Of Draculadoes keep what made its titular character so sinister and creepy. Lon Chaney Jr. proves to be a worthy successor to Bela Lugosi, giving a unique Dracula performance that is softer than Lugosi’s but remains an intimidating presence.Son Of Draculaalso features many twists that will surprise viewers on their first watch.
11Dracula (1979)
Frank Langella Was Deceptively Charming In The Role
Often overshadowed by more iconic movies, the 1979Draculastarring Frank Langella, Laurence Olivier, and Donald Pleasence was a healthy mix of familiarity and uniqueness. Withthe director’s cut being far superior, the film changes the period to have the vampire lord adjusting to an early 20th-century world rather than the Victorian era and forgoes the Transylvania parts of the story.
The movie is based on the Dracula Broadway play, which also starred Frank Langella in the titular role. Instead of a one-note villain, Dracula’s evil was hidden behind a layer of charm and wit, with Langella coming off more as an approachable aristocrat rather than a demon of the night, making the shifts to darkness far more impactful and creepy.
Bram Stoker’s villainous vampire has become a staple of pop culture and a large part of that is due to Bela Lugosi’s Dracula from 1931. It not only revolutionized how audiences viewed vampires but helpedpropel Universal monsters into the spotlightafter other movies such asThe Phantom Of The OperaandDr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde.
Bela Lugosi’s hypnotic performance inDracularemains a famous piece of cinematic history, showing a villain that can be as enchanting as he is haunting. It may not have the visceral uses of blood and gore that modern audiences are used to, but it compensates by making Count Dracula as menacing as possible when he is on the prowl while providing a strong adaptation of the book.
9Dracula Has Risen From The Grave
When Christopher Lee’s Dracula Became A Slasher Villain
Hammer Pictures had found a formula that worked for Christopher Lee’s Dracula, and it continued to be effective inDracula Has Risen From The Grave. With a single drop of blood, Dracula is resurrected once again to prey on the weak and innocent, picking off characters one by one.
It is a testament to Christopher Lee’s talent when the actor expressed his not wanting to return to the role of Dracula, yet he displays the same passion and gravitas as he always gave the role. InDracula Has Risen From The Grave, the vampiric count feels even more like a slasher villain as he stalks a nearby town and feeds on the residents.
With Gary Oldman being the chameleon actor that he is, it is no surprise that he carries Francis Ford Coppola’s adaptation ofBram Stoker’s Draculaasan iconic horror movie of the 90s. Whether he’s Vlad The Impaler, the elderly Count, or the rejuvenated version living at Carfax Abbey, his sinister take on Dracula is not only one of the more complex but also accurate to the novel.
Not only doesBram Stoker’s Draculamake the villain terrifying with the many forms he can take, but they delve heavily into the sexual nature of vampirism, showing the hold he has over his targeted victims like Mina and Lucy. With other standouts such as Anthony Hopkins as Van Helsing and Winona Ryder as Mina Harker, it quickly became a beloved take on the story.
Count Orlok remains an important figure in the world of Dracula adaptations, with the original Nosferatu technically being the first film adaptation of the Bram Stoker novel. In 1979, Werner Herzog created a nearly identical remake, titledNosferatu The Vampyre, taking the bleak and horrifying story and giving it new life with color and sound.
Klaus Kinski portrays Count Orlok, but rather than imitate Max Schreck’s iconic performance, his version is much more subdued. Instead of a wicked and sinister performance, Kinski plays Orlok as a somber and tired immortal with nothing else in his life but his curse to keep him going. However, that doesn’t stop Orlok from being a heart-stopping monster when the scenes require it, with scenes filled with suspense and terror.
It would be easy to assume that a silent film likeNosferatu: A Symphony Of Horrorwould not seem that scary over a century later. However, the German expressionist adaptation of Dracula remains an iconic piece of horror thanks to its use of dark sets, shadows, and the casting of Max Schreck as Count Orlok, AKA the Nosferatu.
With a ghastly visage and the way he performs the character, Max Schreck is the epitome of less is more. Simply standing in a doorway or walking up a flight of stairs madeNosferatu: A Symphony of Horrorinto an inspirational filmthat multiple vampire video games, movies, and television series are influenced by, including the multiple remakes.
Starting in the 1950s, Hammer Film Productions made severalreboots of classic Universal monster movies, includingHorror Of Dracula. It was the movie that first introduced Christopher Lee as the titular villain, showcasing his ability to swap from suave and elegant to brutal and intense as the vampire lord.
Horror Of Draculawas also one of the first times a vampire movie was not afraid to show blood, violence, and gore. The saturated red of the blood mixed with the dark grays and blues of the gothic castle settings established an aesthetic that Hammer would be famous for, and it also influenced future movies such asSleepy HollowandFright Night.
